The extraordinary UAPA court leading the preliminary in the 2013 homicide instance of pragmatist Dr Narendra Dabholkar has condemned the protection attorneys for making applications requesting digitized duplicate of after death, in light of 2014 government notice when the manually written posthumous report from 2013 is clear.
Extra Sessions Judge SR Navander articulated a request against the application looking for computerized posthumous report and noticed that because of obscured penmanship of clinical specialists in legal and clinical reports, a few issues arised in court and law enforcement framework is unfavorably impacted. State had given this general wellbeing round to give composed posthumous report. “For this situation, it is in great penmanship and is neat. It very well may be seen that anybody capable in English can understand it. It is pointless to record composed posthumous report for this situation. This application is without merits,” the appointed authority said in his request.
The application was moved by a group of guard legal advisors including Virendra Ichalkaranjikar, Suvarna Vast, and Prakash Salsingikar.
According to a report documented by Dr Indrajit Khandekar, a round of state government was given on January 6, 2014 that ordered digitisation of after death reports. In any case, Dr Dabholkar was shot dead on August 20, 2013 around 7:30am close to Omkareshwar span in Pune.
Refering to the roundabout, the guard group had requested the digitized duplicate of the posthumous report as the following arraignment witness is the investigation panch and the specialist who led Dr Dabholkar’s post-mortem. In any case, after being addressed by the court for the explanation of this application, the legal counselor said that the penmanship was unintelligible. To this, the Special Public Prosecutor Prakash Suryavanshi fished out the after death report and observed that the report was written in clear and perfect hand in blue ink.
The preliminary hearing was suspended and the following date will be in the main seven day stretch of March. The protection legal advisors addressed blamed including Virendrasinh Sharadchandra Tawade, Sachin Prakashrao Andure, Sharad Bhausaheb Kalaskar, Sanjiv Gajanan Punalekar, and Vikram Vinay Bhave. Among the blamed, just Bhave was available, and the guard legal counselors were generally not present attributable to Covid-19 disease, as indicated by an accommodation made in court by Advocate Meena Dhavade from the protection group.
While Punalekar is coming up against indictments of obliteration of proof, the others are dealing with psychological oppression indictments under Unlawful Activities Prevention Law as well as murder and criminal scheme of Indian Penal Code and Arms Act, among others.
